Turtles and Void Lines

 Lets say a co-worker has a birthday soon. We want to get them a present, but we don't know them that well. So we ask the system:
"What does X think about turtles?"

Problem now is that there is always some chance that X doesn't really have a clear defined position regarding turtles. They have seen turtles, sure maybe even interacted with some, yet never had a reason to define their relation so clearly as to be able to be shown in a line.
People often ask "what does X think about me" it seems. Yet in some cases X would not have a clear idea of what they think about most people. As they never had a reason to define it.

So what happens when we ask then?What do X think about turtles according to the system if they have never thought about it, yet we look for clear answer?

Easy to think the system will just present Void line. They have no position regarding turtles. That is not what happens, in my view, as if that was the case most answers would be void lines... And that is not what happens, as even more so, Void line would be preserved for cases one think "turtles aren't real" or they view their interaction with turtles as hollow.

What happens, as far as I know, is that the field we create when creating the question as usual tries to resonate/immitate the field of the situation the question is asked on, however now it does it with a challenge. With an input to the fields of the person to present a clear and easily recognizable position about turtles.

Simpler way to say it, it will bring up in the person opportunity, a chance to define their relation to turtles.
So lets say the  person is shopping for vegetables at the time someone else is asking. They suddenly receive input of images of turtles with the idea to respond to that. That responds will be shown in the line. They could think its their own thought process as it seems so, yet if they know themselves enough and all anchored to turtles in their world, they would know that wasn't why this was positioned.
However, if the person at that time is very angry, for example as their vegetables are difficult to find in the store, their response will be very different then it would be on the same question if it was asked when they just won the lottery.

So should we wait for the most opportune time to ask then, so we receive the best response?Or we just accept that none of this is 100%, its just reflections and similarities and mirrors... Very , very useful, but never to be taken as 100%.

Anyway, the simple idea is - keep in mind, its not really real. It tries to give us definition and to help us on the path, but if we count solely on this, we are missing out on some of the most wonderful stuff in life, in many cases. Just my view, of course. And I do love these systems, just important to not go to extremes in our reliance to them, some stuff we are suppose to lead and decide on our own I think. : )